NABOKV-L posts by author: Anthony Stadlen
- Re: teaching LolitabyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: RES: [NABOKV-L] Dom Quixote: a world of cruelty and the
author...byAnthony Stadlen - Re: Nabokov and L. TrillingbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Nabokov and L. TrillingbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Invitation to a Beheading and FlatlandbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: SIGHTING: Charlie Chaplin and Humbert in LObyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: RES: [NABOKV-L] QUERY: Signs and SymbolsbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS: Lolita's leaping tailorbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Myers poem in Vane SistersbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [Old SIGHTING] Nabokov's Berlin: Nabokov, art and evilbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [Old SIGHTING] Nabokov's Berlin: Nabokov, art and evilbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [Old SIGHTING] Nabokov's Berlin: Nabokov, art and evilbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Shelley on Mont Blanc... IIbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: the Real Question regarding Humbert's InnocencebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: the Real Question regarding Humbert's InnocencebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Taking Humbert and Quilty SingularlybyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Pnin's own Vladimir?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [ NABOKV-L] [Thoughts] eternal recurrence or infinity?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Centaur in AdabyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: {SIGHTING] Adjectival Nabokov & stylebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHT: VN's aestheticbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHT: VN's ghosts . . . and PNINbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Sibling incest/Isaac, Jacob and RebekkahbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Sibling incest/Isaac, Jacob and RebekkahbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Zolushka/incest tale?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Pale Fire Commentary on Line 130]byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Pale Fire Commentary on Line 130byAnthony Stadlen
- Thanks for my prize!byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: and the winner is ..byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Quiz! Firebird -- ApollobyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Pushkin and Rabelais in PFbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: real Cantaboff solution:CarrouselbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Firebird reply to A. StadlenbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: FirebirdbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Phyllis RothbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: SAD NEWSbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Dieter Zimmer on the 56 Conundrum and Lolita ChronologybyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Dieter Zimmer on the 56 Conundrum and Lolita ChronologybyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Dieter Zimmer on the 56 Conundrum and Lolita ChronologybyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: The "56 days" conundrum in "Lolita"byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: The "56 days" conundrum in "Lolita"byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Back to Bruce Stone:" Editorial In(ter)ference: Errata and
Apo...byAnthony Stadlen - The "56 days" conundrum in "Lolita"byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Humbert Humbert's Courts and Hermetic SessionsbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Gogol: correction of a quotebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Nabokov and Twelve-Year-Old Girls ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Nabokov and Twelve-Year-Old Girls ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Nabokov and Twelve-Year-Old Girls ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Nabokov's "prenatal abyss"byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: QUERY: Did Nabokov actually say this?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [NABOKOV-L][QUERY] Kubrick's Lolita - more portraitsbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: VN and FreudbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Baron von WienbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Scry and mysteriesbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: BotkinbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Botkin]byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [NABOKOV-L] To Stan's helpful comments on mathematical
symbols...byAnthony Stadlen - Re: [NABOKOV-L] Pompons and pumpkinsbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS re: M.Maar's "Speak, Nabokov"byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: M. Maar's "Speak, Nabokov"byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Nabokov & Playboy ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Fw: [NABOKV-L] THOUGHTS: the need for climax in Canto 4byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS: the need for climax in Canto 4byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS: the need for climax in Canto 4byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS: the need for climax in Canto 4byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: a BIRTHDAY proposal?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Semblable: neighbour, fellow, but not doublebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: a BIRTHDAY proposal?byAnthony Stadlen
- Semblable: neighbour, fellow, but not doublebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: a BIRTHDAY proposal?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: QUERY: Down, Fido?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Freud in Soviet literaturebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Dostoevski and psychoanalysisbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHT Abstractist Bric-A-Brac (PF,the poem)byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHT Abstractist Bric-A-Brac (PF,the poem)byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Request for source of quotationbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Request for source of quotationbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [NABOKV-L] Request for source of quotation on
Robbe-...byAnthony Stadlen - Request for source of quotationbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS re the Great Beaver]byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Iris AchtbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: CORRECTION re: 'Signs and Symbols' ...]byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [NABOKOV-L] An amusing contrast in PF's lines about "human
life"byAnthony Stadlen - Re: "Lolita" review ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS re: "My Cue"byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Fw: [NABOKOV-L] On plums and Bend Sinister,PSbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Vseslav & SzeftelbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: correctionbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: SIGHTINGSbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: QUERY: Source for quotationbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Dostoyevsky and NabokovbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: QUERY: Aunts and orphans..an exciting find (maybe)byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: VN in London?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS re: stranger-danger; midges-midgets]byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Lolita in America ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [NABOKOV-L] A muderder's fancy prosebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: borrowed from Vladimir N abokov¹s Lolita ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: borrowed from Vladimir N abokov¹s Lolita ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [NABOKOV-L] ADA: equations, analogies, three swansbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: MORE on Nabokov and FreudbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Steely Dan - Nabokov - a big influence ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [NABOKOV-LIST] [Translation] the card's fat worm
metamorphoses...byAnthony Stadlen - Re: balsam - Balsamo - CagliostrobyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: VN Sighting: Philip Roth's _Exit Ghost_byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: LOlithophanic notebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: SIGNS: final conclusions? More than I dared hope.byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Dmitri Nabokov decides: publish ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Graham Greene's query on VN's possible CatholicismbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: SIGNS: Some responses (the name Rebecca, numbers, beach plums)byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [NABOKOV - LIST] : signs and symbols, chapter three and fourbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: SIGNS: Paragraphs 1-3]byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: [NABOKOV - LIST] : signs and symbols, chapter three and fourbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: SIGNS: why "deranged in his mind" and "unreliable narrators".byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Inner Circle Seminar, London, 11 May, on "Sign and Symbols"byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: SIGNS: why "deranged in his mind"byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: SIGNS: A postscript to background re: earlier discussions on
N-LbyAnthony Stadlen - Re: SIGNS: Paragraphs 1-3byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: QUERY: Lolita's subjectivity and AmericabyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS re: Rote, EliotbyAnthony Stadlen
- 60th anniversary seminar on Nabokov's "Signs and Symbols": call
for speakersbyAnthony Stadlen - Re: puzzle for nabokoviansbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Reading Estrada’s book ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: SIGHTING--VN on memorybyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Carolyn Kunin's questions about how VN saw ShadebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: QUERY: VN's opinion of John Shade?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS: Wenches, hands, and applesbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS on Canto OnebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS on Canto One; Double MonsterbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS: Tumbled BedsbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Aina AchtbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS: Iris Acht in PFbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: THOUGHTS: Iris Acht in PFbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: QUERY: VN on time in TolstoybyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: False Azure, Frost: CHW replybyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: W.Miale re Waugh: from CHWbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: A syllogism and an epitaphbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Kinbote's insanitybyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: A syllogismbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: CHW to SS, MR, JM's recent postsbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Nabokovs brain is shaped like a helter-skelter ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Square roots of i.byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: shadow of a bird imagebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Optics and windows in PF (CHW to JF)byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Kinbote: camouflage or coincidence?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: "C" "K" "S" in PF solution (Caesar, Kaiser, Tsar)byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Mary McCarthy's review of PALE FIREbyAnthony Stadlen
- Mary McCarthy and "Pale Fire" source,
and other material from "Encounter" 1962-3byAnthony Stadlen - Mary McCarthy and "Pale Fire" source,
and other material from "Encounter" 1962-3byAnthony Stadlen - Re: VN's comments on PFbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: VN's comments on PFbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Query: other contemporary literary allusions in PF?rbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Fw: shagbark, a very American tree:hickory or juniper or...?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Query: parenting and PF (Hazel's unattractiveness)byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Help with otherworldly logicbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Fw: shagbark, a very American tree...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Authorship and ShakespearebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: ck to Anthony Stadlen re VN opinion of theoriesbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: CK replies to her criticsbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Replies from CK (and note on index to SO)byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Delusions and Luna mothsbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Replies from CK (and note on index to SO)byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: CK's response to JF which nobody but he will readbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: The Nature of Electricity: "Number nine-hundred-ninety-nine"byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: DN replies to Anthony Stadlen re: end of Pale FirebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: On symmetry IIbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: On symmetrybyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Christianity in Pale FirebyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: bloopers and traps for translatorsbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Shadow SlainbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: The Author's PanopticonbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Little-known effects of reading VNbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Kings never die...( Pale Fire)byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: greatest novel of all is lost out there ...byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: PALE FIRE MAP?byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Freud and VN and psychoanalysisbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Reading Lolita in Tehran in a new lightbyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Lolita as satire (1958 review from National Review)byAnthony Stadlen
- Re: DN on Enchanters and volshebnikibyAnthony Stadlen
- Re: Hunted Enchanters querybyAnthony Stadlen