Subject
ck objects to CHW staunch anti-ism stance
From
Date
Body
I would say that if anything is consistent about VN it is his adamantine
rejection of all isms .... I would regard this as the only acceptable
position of a true artist, but I have to say that it is also elitist, proud
and self-sufficient. I find these things admirable. I would also suggest
that literary theory means very little to genuine practitioners; and the
same goes for truly great practitioners in any field. Theory is for
observers and teachers, not for doers.
Charles
From Carolyn to Charles,
Something here disturbs me - - most likely the cult worship of the true
artist, that whiff of Ayn Rand, if you'll allow me. You seem to be
describing her more than the VN I know. His was an aristocracy that didn't
condescend to democracy, but embraced it wholeheartedly. Who after all was
the "true artist" - - Lolita? or Humbert? I often think VN doesn't think
very highly of artists as a class of humanity.
Since I mentioned Roman Jakobson in my last post, let me stand up for
Formalism, which I doubt VN rejected - - or am I mistaken?
By the way, not to forget that VN was as much observer, scholar, scientist
and teacher as anything else.
Carolyn
Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm