Subject
Fw: discussion of pale fire moviemaking
From
Date
Body
----- Original Message -----
From: <Herbandgin@aol.com>
>
> ----------------- Message requiring your approval (8
lines) -------------------
> a propos of the discussion about cinematizing pale fire, on page 395 of
Kurt
> Anderson's very funny, very sophisticated but perhaps somewhat
unchallenging
> formally novel, Turn of the century, there is a reference to Nabokov and
Bill
> Gaddis to the effect that one of characters of the novel a billionaire but
> qurky stock manipulator named Ben Gould has secretly been buying out the
> movie rights to their fiction with the intent of holding them in
perpetuity
> so that no cineastic sacrilege can take place. Not a bad idea.
> herb smith
From: <Herbandgin@aol.com>
>
> ----------------- Message requiring your approval (8
lines) -------------------
> a propos of the discussion about cinematizing pale fire, on page 395 of
Kurt
> Anderson's very funny, very sophisticated but perhaps somewhat
unchallenging
> formally novel, Turn of the century, there is a reference to Nabokov and
Bill
> Gaddis to the effect that one of characters of the novel a billionaire but
> qurky stock manipulator named Ben Gould has secretly been buying out the
> movie rights to their fiction with the intent of holding them in
perpetuity
> so that no cineastic sacrilege can take place. Not a bad idea.
> herb smith