Vladimir Nabokov

NABOKV-L post 0013827, Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:29:16 -0500

Subject
PF poem (quality of) vs. WS
From
Date
Body
-“By your standards Shakespeare's sonnets would not be poetry either, since some of those have very much been worried into being (take sonnet
104, for instance). You might try broadening your tastes.” Brian Boyd

The argument doesn't hold, because the premise is that for the sonnet sequence to function all must adhere to some coherent level of the poetical. Auden I think thought a mere third excellent, most of the rest readable for one or two spots of memorable phrasing, and a handful little more than dutiful duds. This fact of course does not alter the general judgement of modern taste that the sequence constitutes an extraordinary achievement of sustained poetical intensities. When Shakespeare falters, most accomplished poets, fluttering in the lower airs, would admire the pindaric hovering above them.

Peter Dale

Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm






Attachment