Subject
Re: V. Fet re: E. Darwin's poem
From
Date
Body
On 4/3/07 15:35, "Nabokv-L" <nabokv-l@UTK.EDU> wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [NABOKV-L] S.S. re: E. Darwin's poem
> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:22:29 -0500
> From: Fet, Victor <fet@MARSHALL.EDU> <mailto:fet@MARSHALL.EDU>
> To: Vladimir Nabokov Forum <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
> <mailto:NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
> References: A <45E9DF9B.70005@utk.edu> <mailto:45E9DF9B.70005@utk.edu>
>>>> >>>what other works containing important parts written in verse and in
>>>> prose we could
> compare with PF?
>
> Why not "Hamlet", for instance? I know nothing of the literary theory one can
> put behind it, but one can claim that its (and other Shakespearian plays)
> structure profoundly affected poetry/prose combinations. We have so many
> Shakespeare/Hamlet influences in VN in general and PF specifically, hidden and
> not (including its very title), that PF "format" itself could be seen as one
> of those.
>
> Victor Fet
>
> Dear Victor: we also have THE PLAY WITHIN THE PLAY! Signs of WS mocking the
> more bombastic elements of Elizabethan drama? in spite of Hamlet¹s don¹t
> over-act¹ warnings to the visiting players.
>
> Stan Kelly-Bootle
Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [NABOKV-L] S.S. re: E. Darwin's poem
> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:22:29 -0500
> From: Fet, Victor <fet@MARSHALL.EDU> <mailto:fet@MARSHALL.EDU>
> To: Vladimir Nabokov Forum <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
> <mailto:NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
> References: A <45E9DF9B.70005@utk.edu> <mailto:45E9DF9B.70005@utk.edu>
>>>> >>>what other works containing important parts written in verse and in
>>>> prose we could
> compare with PF?
>
> Why not "Hamlet", for instance? I know nothing of the literary theory one can
> put behind it, but one can claim that its (and other Shakespearian plays)
> structure profoundly affected poetry/prose combinations. We have so many
> Shakespeare/Hamlet influences in VN in general and PF specifically, hidden and
> not (including its very title), that PF "format" itself could be seen as one
> of those.
>
> Victor Fet
>
> Dear Victor: we also have THE PLAY WITHIN THE PLAY! Signs of WS mocking the
> more bombastic elements of Elizabethan drama? in spite of Hamlet¹s don¹t
> over-act¹ warnings to the visiting players.
>
> Stan Kelly-Bootle
Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm