Subject
Re: Botkin]
From
Date
Body
Beginning with Lenin in 1920, the USSR establishment took chess extremely
seriously, and exploited the sport politically. Despite Botvinnik's bona
fides as a grandmaster, allegations have been raised (and not conclusively
answered) that great pressure was brought to bear on the Estonian Paul Keres
to lose his 4 games with Botvinnik in the 1948 World Championship
Tournament; the same sort of allegations exist about Botvinnik's defeat of
the Jewish Grandmaster David Bronstein in the 1951 World Championship match
(Bronstein was a brilliant player, but managed only one draw from the last 2
games of the 24-game match and Botvinnik was allowed to keep his title with
a score of 12-12 under the World Chess Federation rules of the day).
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Nabokv-L <nabokv-l@utk.edu> wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [NABOKV-L] Botkin Date: Mon,
> 6 Sep 2010 13:22:20 +0100 From: Stan <stan@bootle.biz> <stan@bootle.biz> To:
> Vladimir Nabokov Forum <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU><NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU> References:
> <177a5b.4b851fb8.39b41ffe@aol.com> <177a5b.4b851fb8.39b41ffe@aol.com>
> <SNT112-W2753120A28C570947337CBE88F0@phx.gbl><SNT112-W2753120A28C570947337CBE88F0@phx.gbl>
> For what it's worth (un pet de lapin?) Mikhail BOTVINNIK (1911-95) was a
> leading Soviet Chess Grandmaster, becoming World Champion first in 1948. I'm
> sure the startling near-anagram has been spotted by others. Remove VIN ( =
> I, VN!) and out comes our two-faced deceiver.
>
> Jansy, methinks, reads too much into the literal string-matches with the
> letters KIN. It's such a common diminutive suffix (catkin, bumpkin,
> bod[t]kin), unrelated (except to devout monists!) to the KIN in
> kinship/kithship or PushKIN.
>
> BTW JM: delighted you are reading Ian Stewart, FRS, and hope some real
> mathematical osmosis will inspire you. You should next read his How to Cut a
> Cake - and other Mathematical Conundrums. And not just because Ian quotes
> one of my songs (Lemma 3 Very Pretty) as a sign that mathematicians can have
> plain-daft FUN!
>
> I was pleased to see one recent contributor reminding us that Pale Fire is,
> after all, a SATIRE, and to many of us, possibly the greatest such since
> Swift in stretching that fuzzy genre in so many sublime directions. E.g., we
> have Shade, a not-that-great fictional, academic poet using inappropriate
> prosody to ponder Life's major and minor ontologies. VN has Shade pen both
> the greatest lines since Keats, and the funniest doggerel since McGonnigal.
> Lurking behind CK's quasi-scholastic nit-picking, 'must-have-the-last-word'
> commentary is the Elephant-in-the-Room: a WARNING against similar LitCrit
> excesses in dissecting Pale Fire, the novel. The sweet paradox is that VN
> himself, with those 4-volumes on Onegin, was the master of ultra-zealous,
> mind-boggling exegesis. (Paraphrasing an earlier quip on Keatsian
> scholarship, 'Not one of Pushkin's Laundry Lists must go unexamined!') I
> trust that this encourages MORE and BETTER Pale Fire analysis?
>
> Stan Kelly-Bootle
>
> Search the archive<http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en> Contact
> the Editors <nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu> Visit "Nabokov
> Online Journal" <http://www.nabokovonline.com> Visit Zembla<http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm> View
> Nabokv-L Policies <http://web.utk.edu/%7Esblackwe/EDNote.htm> Manage
> subscription options <http://listserv.ucsb.edu/>
>
> All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both
> co-editors.
>
--
Norky
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com
Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/
seriously, and exploited the sport politically. Despite Botvinnik's bona
fides as a grandmaster, allegations have been raised (and not conclusively
answered) that great pressure was brought to bear on the Estonian Paul Keres
to lose his 4 games with Botvinnik in the 1948 World Championship
Tournament; the same sort of allegations exist about Botvinnik's defeat of
the Jewish Grandmaster David Bronstein in the 1951 World Championship match
(Bronstein was a brilliant player, but managed only one draw from the last 2
games of the 24-game match and Botvinnik was allowed to keep his title with
a score of 12-12 under the World Chess Federation rules of the day).
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Nabokv-L <nabokv-l@utk.edu> wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [NABOKV-L] Botkin Date: Mon,
> 6 Sep 2010 13:22:20 +0100 From: Stan <stan@bootle.biz> <stan@bootle.biz> To:
> Vladimir Nabokov Forum <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU><NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU> References:
> <177a5b.4b851fb8.39b41ffe@aol.com> <177a5b.4b851fb8.39b41ffe@aol.com>
> <SNT112-W2753120A28C570947337CBE88F0@phx.gbl><SNT112-W2753120A28C570947337CBE88F0@phx.gbl>
> For what it's worth (un pet de lapin?) Mikhail BOTVINNIK (1911-95) was a
> leading Soviet Chess Grandmaster, becoming World Champion first in 1948. I'm
> sure the startling near-anagram has been spotted by others. Remove VIN ( =
> I, VN!) and out comes our two-faced deceiver.
>
> Jansy, methinks, reads too much into the literal string-matches with the
> letters KIN. It's such a common diminutive suffix (catkin, bumpkin,
> bod[t]kin), unrelated (except to devout monists!) to the KIN in
> kinship/kithship or PushKIN.
>
> BTW JM: delighted you are reading Ian Stewart, FRS, and hope some real
> mathematical osmosis will inspire you. You should next read his How to Cut a
> Cake - and other Mathematical Conundrums. And not just because Ian quotes
> one of my songs (Lemma 3 Very Pretty) as a sign that mathematicians can have
> plain-daft FUN!
>
> I was pleased to see one recent contributor reminding us that Pale Fire is,
> after all, a SATIRE, and to many of us, possibly the greatest such since
> Swift in stretching that fuzzy genre in so many sublime directions. E.g., we
> have Shade, a not-that-great fictional, academic poet using inappropriate
> prosody to ponder Life's major and minor ontologies. VN has Shade pen both
> the greatest lines since Keats, and the funniest doggerel since McGonnigal.
> Lurking behind CK's quasi-scholastic nit-picking, 'must-have-the-last-word'
> commentary is the Elephant-in-the-Room: a WARNING against similar LitCrit
> excesses in dissecting Pale Fire, the novel. The sweet paradox is that VN
> himself, with those 4-volumes on Onegin, was the master of ultra-zealous,
> mind-boggling exegesis. (Paraphrasing an earlier quip on Keatsian
> scholarship, 'Not one of Pushkin's Laundry Lists must go unexamined!') I
> trust that this encourages MORE and BETTER Pale Fire analysis?
>
> Stan Kelly-Bootle
>
> Search the archive<http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en> Contact
> the Editors <nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu> Visit "Nabokov
> Online Journal" <http://www.nabokovonline.com> Visit Zembla<http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm> View
> Nabokv-L Policies <http://web.utk.edu/%7Esblackwe/EDNote.htm> Manage
> subscription options <http://listserv.ucsb.edu/>
>
> All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both
> co-editors.
>
--
Norky
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com
Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/