Query: Erica Jong, addressing Lolita's readership, emphasizes that the "erection of small dorsal hairs is the issue here and not, as is commonly assumed, other sorts of tumescence," thereby offering a kind of feminine endorsement to the physical delights which must arise through the practice of art and science, independently of other lachrimal and pilous reactions.  Nevertheless, Nabokov's authoritative assessment remains a puzzle to me:  why is the "little shiver behind the highest form of emotion that humanity has attained when evolving pure art and science"? (Cf. LL 54)    


Google Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal" Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options Visit AdaOnline View NSJ Ada Annotations Temporary L-Soft Search the archive

All private editorial communications are read by both co-editors.