Steve Norquist: "...your comments about searching for the
"real" within VN's fiction are intriguing! In the statement about "coming
before himself," HH seems to be imagining himself as a criminal court judge
sitting in judgment of a rapist. Do you see a hint in this sentence ("...I
would have given Humbert at least thirty-five years for rape, and dismissed the
rest of the charges...") that perhaps the murder of Quilty is "imaginary" after
all? What judge worth his/her salt would nonchalantly dismiss a murder
(generally considered the most serious crime of all)?"
JM: In "Solomon and the Witch" W.B. Yeats poetically
renders a division between a person's subjective constructions and what is
external to them: "Maybe the bride-bed brings despair,/ For each an
imagined image brings/ And finds a real image there.." This gap between an
individual's variegated distorted representations set against the
world's constancy may be potentialized by writers, like Nabokov. For me
(quite surprisingly) it's easier to approach a
fictional character's "real" in "Pale Fire" than in "Lolita".
When Humbert Humbert imagines himself as a defendant and a judge at the same
time, a legitimate invention in common-life, in his case this also entails
a description and an actualization of the way he feels and
acts under such a "splitting process." He is scattered all over the
world... The only moment of fictional "real", in my opinion, is when all the
pieces fleetingly reunite and he laments Dolly's fate and describes
his "beard and his putrefaction" ("life is not a joke"). This is the most
impressive moment in the entire novel, but only for me and carrying the
burden of a reader's caprice. After all VN, in the Afterword,
chose another scene, one that is considered as HH's "moral
apotheosis" - and his knowledge about what he intended to write is
supreme.
Take Pale Fire, now. Fictional Kinbote's "imaged image" of
John Shade's poem is shattered when he reads the manuscript and sees its "real
image."
However, delusion sets in again soon enough and Kinbote will
attempt to distort the perception of all Shade's future readers
and make his verses conform to his, Kinbote's, "imaged image." He
distorts the original poem and the original "biographical elements" to suit his
needs...
In parallel to this, Kinbote introduces Zembla and Gradus, which obey the
logic of the realm of fables. Zembla and Gradus preserve a fictional
consistency that is often absent from Kinbote's invention of Wordsmith (it
sounds reasonably like a satire of the real thing)!
In PF I encounter two "terra firma" (to borrow B.Stone's use of the
words):(a) a poetic one (John Shade's autonomous poem, if we manage to
clean it from any false variants); (b) a fabulous one (Zembla and Gradus).
The rest is a flock of iridules in an unclouded sky.. I suppose that,
metafictionally, there is also the firm ground constituted by the novel's
(VN) style and structure. .
I hope I haven't merely suffered a Shadean strok or a
sudden "moonburst of madness" (like it happens with Krug over and
over)...