Please explain the phrase "morally
anaerobic", it makes no sense to me.
This book doesn't require oxygen for its morals?
Emily
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:52 PM, John Minervini
<john.minervini@gmail.com> wrote:
As regards Humbert's remorse: my criticism was not that Will (Evison's protagonist) should, like Humbert,
feel shame. Rather, I merely suggest that Will's actions should be
considered in their moral dimension. As it stands, the book is morally
anaerobic, which (I think) is irresponsible.
As regards being derivative: I have no trouble with Evison's borrowing or writing in a
mould - but he needs, at least, to add something original, something of
interest, differentiate himself. He does not.
John Minervini
--
An overcivilized people grow complacent and careless and leave the door open for a tribe of fanatical savages, through a mixture of luck, treachery, and the foulest inhumanity, to usurp their place for a few years.
-Richard Adams, "Shardik", 1974