In a message dated 08/08/2008 14:22:40 GMT Standard Time, skb@BOOTLE.BIZ
writes:
Evison
is slated as "derivative" at one stage, yet blamed later in the review because
Will shows none of H-H's remorse.
Nabokov is much too subtle, and also too morally
straightforward, a writer for Humbert's attitude to be described simply as
"remorse". Nabokov (in "Strong Opinions" merely grants him one evening's parole
a year from Hell. Somebody truly remorseful would not have gone on to murder
Quilty on the grounds that Quilty did not recognise Humbert's essential inner
innocence! I have often commented on the moral bankruptcy of much of the
discussion by literary people of what are quite simple, but in no way
simplistic, moral issues.
Anthony Stadlen