So was Vladimir Nabokov (1899-1977)
secretly a fundamentalist Christian, a mad man, or just plain ignorant? The
great novelist (Lolita, Pale Fire, Pnin) was, in his
own telling, a "furious" critic of Darwinian theory. He based the judgment not
on religion, to which biographer Brian Boyd writes that he was "profoundly indifferent," but on decades of his
scientific study of butterflies, including at Harvard and the American Museum of
Natural History. Of course, this was all before the culture-wide sclerosis of
Darwinian orthodoxy set in.
As Boyd notes in Vladimir
Nabokov: The American Years, "He could not accept that the undirected
randomness of natural selection would ever explain the elaborateness of nature's
designs, especially in the most complex cases of mimicry where the design
appears to exceed any predator’s powers of apprehension."
Boyd summarized the artist's scientific bona fides in an appreciation in Natural History.
Boyd summarized the artist's scientific bona fides in an appreciation in Natural History.
For most of the 1940s, he served as de facto curator of lepidoptera at Harvard University’s Museum of Comparative Zoology, and became the authority on the little-studied blue butterflies (Polyommatini) of North and South America. He was also a pioneer in the study of butterflies' microscopic anatomy, distinguishing otherwise almost identical blues by differences in their genital parts.Later employed at Harvard as a research fellow in entomology while teaching comp lit at Wellesley, Nabokov published scientific journal articles in The Entomologist, The Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, The Lepidopterists' News, and Psyche: A Journal of Entomology.