Appel wrote (AnL p.365): "...The verbal form of
solipsist is of course H.H.'s coinage - a most significant pormanteau suggesting
that Lolita has been reduced in more than size... H.H. addresses the nymphet's
solipsized condition: "What I had madly possessed was not she, but my own
creation..." and I have no idea if there was an
intended word-play with "size" in Appel's note, but VN himself seems to
have played with the word "Sol", i.e, "Sun"
when he added, after "solipsized": "the implied sun
pulsated in the supplied poplars"
HH wrote (AnL, p. 60-61): " I entered
a plane of being where nothing mattered, save the infusion of joy brewed withing
my body...I felt I could slow down in order to prolong the glow. Lolita had been
safely solipsized. The implied sun pulsated in the supplied poplars...In
my self-made seraglio, I was a radiant and robust Turk...the longest ecstasy man
or monster had ever known."
As Appel aptly noted, the "solipsized Lolita" refers to
the moments in which H.H. can only perceive the young girl as a
nymphet, chiefly during erotic
ecstasies. Nevertheless we can find other, more discreet raptures,
with the same "solipsistic" ( or fetichistic) elements:
1."But all that
was nothing, absolutely nothing, to the indescribable itch of rapture that her
tennis game produced in me — the teasing delirious feeling of
teetering on the very brink of unearthly order and splendor.Despite her advanced
age, she was more of a nymphet than ever... Winged gentlemen!";
2."this
"Haze, Dolores" (she!) in its special bower of names, with its
bodyguard of roses — a fairy princess between her two maids of honor. I am
trying to analyze the spine-thrill of delight it gives me, this name among all
those others."
Now in answer to J. Studdard's remark
concerning "a trend of conclusions that solipsises Lolita.":
I was referring to interpretations that see as
predominant the theme of HH's disrespect and ignorance about a girl's
dreams, hopes, fears, tears,etc, or his utter inability
to grant an independent life and voice to his creation. Such
interpretations tend to ignore the more poignant moments in which
VN outlines an abused child's (any abused voiceless child's!) terrors,
traumas and impairment. This VN
achieves by transforming "absence" into glaring
presence both by his real regret or by his cold
appraisal of the consequences of his lecherous & controlling
acts.
In my opinion the reader doesn't need
to "know or to guess who the actual (fictional) Dolores Haze might
be" because her "absence" is, by itself, an extremely effective
literary instrument, a resource that lies way beyond any kind
of sociological, moralistic or psychological
analysis.