A reply for Anthony Stadlen: 
 
When time came to do posthumous translations of Volshebnik into sevaral
languages, I felt duty-bound to follow Father's express instructions to
use the title The Enchanter and its variants. I too was a little
uncomfortable about the juxtaposition with his frequently stated view
that a writer should, above all, be "an enchanter." But cannot one adapt
the use of a word to different moments and different contexts? In the
novella, Arthur (explicitly named only in a draft version) tries to
enchant his prey -- or fantasizes that he is doing so -- in order to
achieve his end, while a writer, for VN, should create an aura of
aesthetic enchantment wherein his reader's first experience will be the
famous tingle of the spine.
 
DN 

Search the Nabokv-L archive at UCSB

Contact the Editors

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.