----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: ADA's Mascodagama and Dostoevsky's "The Possessed"
(Besy)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 12:13
PM
Subject: ADA's Mascodagama and
Dostoevsky's "The Possessed" (Besy)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw:ADA's Mascodagama and Dostoevsky's "The
Possessed" (Besy)
Dear Jansy,
In the first place, I don't think Log has a mind. He, or, rather, It, is
not to be confused with Nabokov. Logos is but a powerful tool in
Nabokov's hands that he uses to create Antiterra. Just like in the beginning
of our world some say was the Word. But the difference between our World (if
it was created by a God) and Antiterra lies in the Antiterran Logos being
not only the first impulse in the universe's creation, but also a live
organism that enables this planet to exist in the readers'
minds.
There is an
obvious link between the episode you mention ("ploughing") and Van's
appearance as Mascodagama, especially in the London theater where he is given
a partner: fragile, red-haired 'Rita', "who bore an odd resemblance to
Lucette as she was to look ten years later" (actually,
thirteen years later, when Van meets her for the last time in Paris and
then on board Tobakoff). If we look carefully, we shall see that both the
ploughing scene (with Van as a "ploughboy") and Mascodagama's performance
prefigure Lucette's suicide by jumping into the Atlantic. I'm sure Brian Boyd
tells all about it in his book on ADA.
Alexey
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 6:02
AM
Subject: Fw: Fw:ADA's Mascodagama and
Dostoevsky's "The Possessed" (Besy)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw:ADA's Mascodagama and Dostoevsky's "The
Possessed" (Besy)
Dear Alexey
I cannot coherently argue
back when I know that you don´t accept, being a faithful
Nabokovian, the mobile and surprising "unconscious" described by
Freud plus what has been added to its understanding from
Saussure´s linguistic theory of "the significant".
I agree that Nabokov is
undisputedly his fictional characters´ God but still, he has not
entirely invented the language he used to build his novels or to
endow his people with warm, pulsating lives.
For me the workings
of language remain a compelling mystery that is quite independent
of an author´s mastery of it.
But assuming one
can understand our Log´s mind: do you in any way link the
episode in which Van propels Lucette like a cart -
by holding her feet in his hands, without upturning her, while
she nibbles a daisy - to his
somersaulting caprioles?
Jansy
----- Original Message -----